QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 5 (2006): 1291-1301
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1291
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs
 * Access To Care Woes
 * Public Coverage More Efficient
 * Empowering Consumers
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Online Appendix
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Grabowski, H.
* Articles by Long, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Grabowski, H.
* Articles by Long, G.
Related Collections
* Insurance Market
* Access To Care
* Business Of Health
* Consumer Issues
* Evidence-Based Medicine
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending

Evolution & Future

The Market For Follow-On Biologics: How Will It Evolve?

Henry Grabowski, Iain Cockburn and Genia Long

With spending on biologics rising and patent expiry approaching for several blockbuster biologics, Congress and the Food and Drug Administration are considering creating a clear pathway for so-called follow-on biologics. Differences between drugs and biologics will affect market outcomes in various ways. Conservative budget impacts are appropriate in the short run because fewer competitors will enter, and average prices will drop less than was the case following the Hatch-Waxman Act. Over the long term, intellectual property provisions will be important considerations for policymakers designing a pathway for follow-on biologics that balances price competition and innovation incentives.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Dudzinski and A. S. Kesselheim
Scientific and Legal Viability of Follow-on Protein Drugs
N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 843 - 849.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. M. Hoffman, N. D. Shah, L. C. Vermeulen, G. T. Schumock, P. Grim, R. J. Hunkler, and K. M. Hontz
Projecting future drug expenditures--2007
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 1, 2007; 64(3): 298 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies