QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 5 (2006): 1319-1331
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1319
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Online Technical Appendix
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Goldman, D. P.
* Articles by Willey, V.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Goldman, D. P.
* Articles by Willey, V.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care
* Managed Care - Consumers
* Business Of Health
* Pharmaceuticals
* Chronic Care
* Quality Of Care
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market

Specialty Drugs

Benefit Design And Specialty Drug Use

Dana P. Goldman, Geoffrey F. Joyce, Grant Lawless, William H. Crown and Vincent Willey

In this paper we examine spending by privately insured patients with four conditions often treated with specialty drugs: cancer, kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Despite having employer-sponsored health insurance, these patients face substantial risk for high out-of-pocket spending. In contrast to traditional pharmaceuticals, we find that specialty drug use is largely insensitive to cost sharing, with price elasticities ranging from 0.01 to 0.21. Given the expense of many specialty drugs, care management should focus on making sure that patients who will most benefit receive them. Once such patients are identified, it makes little economic sense to limit coverage.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
V. J. Willey, M. F. Pollack, W. M. Lednar, W. N. Yang, C. Kennedy, and G. Lawless
Costs Of Severely Ill Members And Specialty Medication Use In A Commercially Insured Population
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 824 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. P. Goldman, G. F. Joyce, and Y. Zheng
Prescription Drug Cost Sharing: Associations With Medication and Medical Utilization and Spending and Health
JAMA, July 4, 2007; 298(1): 61 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies