QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 6 (2006): 1637-1647
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1637
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Online Appendices
* Erratum
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kesselheim, A. S.
* Articles by Avorn, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kesselheim, A. S.
* Articles by Avorn, J.
Related Collections
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Medicaid
* Business Of Health
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Extensions Of Intellectual Property Rights And Delayed Adoption Of Generic Drugs: Effects On Medicaid Spending

Aaron S. Kesselheim, Michael A. Fischer and Jerry Avorn

Rising prescription drug costs present a critical policy issue for Medicaid. Generic substitution can reduce costs, but the effects are undercut by extensions of intellectual property (IP) protection, elevated generic prices, and low substitution rates. Using Medicaid prescription data for amoxicillin/clavulanate, metformin, and omeprazole, we calculated the savings that could have been realized if generic drugs had been available and fully substituted at their lowest cost when IP protection first expired (an average delay of twenty-six months). The delay in availability, elevated prices, and slow uptake of generic alternatives for these three drugs alone cost Medicaid $1.5 billion in 2000–2004.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
A. S. Kesselheim and J. Avorn
Using Patent Data to Assess the Value of Pharmaceutical Innovation
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2009; 37(2): 176 - 183.
[PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Moe, H. Grabowski, D. Ridley, and A. S. Kesselheim
FDA Review Vouchers
N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 2009; 360(8): 837 - 838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. S. Kesselheim, A. S. Misono, J. L. Lee, M. R. Stedman, M. A. Brookhart, N. K. Choudhry, and W. H. Shrank
Clinical Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs Used in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
JAMA, December 3, 2008; 300(21): 2514 - 2526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. S. Kesselheim and N. K. Choudhry
The International Pharmaceutical Market as a Source of Low-Cost Prescription Drugs for U.S. Patients
Ann Intern Med, April 15, 2008; 148(8): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Dudzinski and A. S. Kesselheim
Scientific and Legal Viability of Follow-on Protein Drugs
N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 843 - 849.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Potential Bias and Confounding Effects: Challenges in the Analysis of Prescription Data
Kennon R. Copeland, et al.
Health Affairs, 30 May 2007 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies