Health Affairs, 26, no. 1 (2007): w1-w12
(Published online 21 November 2006)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w1
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Cubanski, J.
* Articles by Neuman, P.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Cubanski, J.
* Articles by Neuman, P.

Web Exclusives

Status Report On Medicare Part D Enrollment In 2006: Analysis Of Plan-Specific Market Share And Coverage

Juliette Cubanski and Patricia Neuman

The centerpiece of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 was the Part D drug benefit, provided through new stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) and Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MA-PD) plans. We examine 2006 Part D enrollment data to analyze organization- and plan-level market share and enrollment by plan type, benefit design, and gap coverage. Ten organizations captured 72 percent of Part D enrollment, primarily in low-premium plans and those with name recognition. More than twelve million Part D enrollees without low-income subsidies enrolled in plans with limited or no gap coverage in 2006, but the number with actual spending in the gap remains to be seen.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Neuman and J. Cubanski
Medicare Part D Update -- Lessons Learned and Unfinished Business
N. Engl. J. Med., July 23, 2009; 361(4): 406 - 414.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
N. K. Choudhry, J. L. Lee, J. Agnew-Blais, C. Corcoran, and W. H. Shrank
Drug Company-Sponsored Patient Assistance Programs: A Viable Safety Net?
Health Aff., May 1, 2009; 28(3): 827 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Hsu, V. Fung, M. Price, J. Huang, R. Brand, R. Hui, B. Fireman, and J. P. Newhouse
Medicare Beneficiaries' Knowledge of Part D Prescription Drug Program Benefits and Responses to Drug Costs
JAMA, April 23, 2008; 299(16): 1929 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. K. Choudhry, A. R. Patrick, E. M. Antman, J. Avorn, and W. H. Shrank
Cost-Effectiveness of Providing Full Drug Coverage to Increase Medication Adherence in Post-Myocardial Infarction Medicare Beneficiaries
Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1261 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. Lopert and M. Moon
Toward A Rational, Value-Based Drug Benefit For Medicare
Health Aff., November 1, 2007; 26(6): 1666 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. Neuman, M. K. Strollo, S. Guterman, W. H. Rogers, A. Li, A. M. C. Rodday, and D. G. Safran
Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings From A 2006 National Survey Of Seniors
Health Aff., September 1, 2007; 26(5): w630 - w643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. Gold
Medicare Advantage In 2006-2007: What Congress Intended?
Health Aff., July 1, 2007; 26(4): w445 - w455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]