QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 3 (2007): 684-695
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.684
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Garrison, L. P.
* Articles by Bresnahan, B. W.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by Garrison, L. P., Jr.
* Articles by Bresnahan, B. W.
Related Collections
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Medicare
* Pharmaceuticals
* Physicians
* Research And Technology
* Consumer Issues

Tools & Incentives

Assessing A Structured, Quantitative Health Outcomes Approach To Drug Risk-Benefit Analysis

Louis P. Garrison, Jr., Adrian Towse and Brian W. Bresnahan

Regulatory authorities make difficult risk-benefit decisions when approving new drugs. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committees and reviewers must consider a complex body of evidence, including efficacy and safety results of trials, disease epidemiology, potential side effects, and patients’ needs. However, this menu of information is not usually presented in a consistent and integrated framework. The members of an FDA review panel vote with some unobserved, implicit weighting of the evidence. This paper argues that outcomes research tools for modeling long-term health outcomes, measuring health preferences, and establishing the value of additional information could provide a more structured, transparent, and quantitative process of assessing risk-benefit balance.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. P. Thompson, K. Noyes, E. R. Dorsey, S. R. Schwid, and R. G. Holloway
Quantitative risk-benefit analysis of natalizumab
Neurology, July 29, 2008; 71(5): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies