QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 3 (2007): w415-w424
(Published online 17 April 2007)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w415
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Obama's Success & Next Steps
 * 3 Health Policy Options for President Obama
 * A Hybrid Proposal
 * Bipartisan Compromise
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Mitchell, J. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Mitchell, J. M.
Related Collections
* Ethical Issues
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Physicians
* Consumer Issues

Web Exclusives

The Prevalence Of Physician Self-Referral Arrangements After Stark II: Evidence From Advanced Diagnostic Imaging

Jean M. Mitchell

Using data from a large insurer in California, we identified the self-referral status of providers who billed for advanced imaging in 2004. Nearly 33 percent of providers who submitted bills for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 22 percent of those who submitted bills for computed tomography (CT) scans, and 17 percent of those who submitted bills for positron-emission tomography (PET) scans were classified as "self-referral." Among them, 61 percent of those who billed for MRI and 64 percent of those who billed for CT did not own the imaging equipment. Rather, they were involved in lease or payment-per-scan referral arrangements that might violate federal and state laws.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. Smith-Bindman, D. L. Miglioretti, and E. B. Larson
Rising Use Of Diagnostic Medical Imaging In A Large Integrated Health System
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1491 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. Appleby
The Case Of CT Angiography: How Americans View And Embrace New Technology
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1515 - 1521.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
H. H. Pham and P. B. Ginsburg
Unhealthy Trends: The Future Of Physician Services
Health Aff., November 1, 2007; 26(6): 1586 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Limited Implications
Robert G. Burney, M.D.
Health Affairs, 17 Apr 2007 [Full text]
Self-Referral/Equality for All Physicians?
Harlan R. Weinberg, MD, FCCP
Health Affairs, 18 Apr 2007 [Full text]
Exploitation or Intention?
Bradford Kirkman-Liff
Health Affairs, 18 Apr 2007 [Full text]
Appropriateness Of Imaging Services Needs To Be Explored
Timothy Trysla
Health Affairs, 25 Apr 2007 [Full text]
Simplistic View
Robert Varipapa
Health Affairs, 13 Jun 2007 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies