Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): 1078-1087
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1078
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Willcox, S.
* Articles by Tu, J. V.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Willcox, S.
* Articles by Tu, J. V.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Hospitals
* International Issues
* Consumer Issues

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Measuring And Reducing Waiting Times: A Cross-National Comparison Of Strategies

Sharon Willcox, Mary Seddon, Stephen Dunn, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Jim Pearse and Jack V. Tu

We compare strategies to manage surgical waiting times in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and Wales to give policy insights into those that are most effective. Most of these countries have allocated dedicated funding and set explicit waiting time targets. Of the five countries, England has achieved the most sustained improvement, linked to major funding boosts, ambitious waiting-time targets, and a rigorous performance management system. While supply-side strategies are used in all five countries, New Zealand and parts of Canada have also invested in demand-side strategies through the use of clinical criteria to prioritize access to surgery.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
G. Domenighetti, P. Vineis, C. De Pietro, and A. Tomada
Ability to pay and equity in access to Italian and British National Health Services
Eur J Public Health, February 8, 2010; (2010) ckq001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
N. Rice, S. Robone, and P. C. Smith
International Comparison of Public Sector Performance: The Use of Anchoring Vignettes to adjust Self-Reported Data
Evaluation, January 1, 2010; 16(1): 81 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
B. Jahn, K. P. Pfeiffer, E. Theurl, J.-E. Tarride, and R. Goeree
Capacity Constraints and Cost-Effectiveness: A Discrete Event Simulation for Drug-Eluting Stents
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2010; 30(1): 16 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
A. Harrison and J. Appleby
Reducing waiting times for hospital treatment: lessons from the English NHS
J Health Serv Res Policy, July 1, 2009; 14(3): 168 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Bevan
Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS? No
BMJ, January 16, 2009; 338(jan16_2): a3129 - a3129.
[Full Text]