Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): 1129-1134 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1129 © 2007 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sabin, J. E. Articles by Cochran, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sabin, J. E. Articles by Cochran, D. Related Collections Ethical Issues Business Of Health

Health Tracking

FROM THE FIELD

Confronting Trade-Offs In Health Care: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care’s Organizational Ethics Program

Patients, providers, and policy leaders need a new moral compass to guide them in the turbulent U.S. health care system. Task forces have proposed excellent ethical codes, but these have been seen as too abstract to provide guidance at the front lines. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care’s ten-year experience with an organizational ethics program suggests ways in which health care organizations can strengthen transparency, consumer focus, and overall ethical performance and contribute to the national health policy dialogue.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. H. Fletcher, J. E. Sabin, and J. Dorsey Is Patient Cost-Sharing the Best Way to Protect the Medical Commons? Ann Intern Med, September 16, 2008; 149(6): 435 - 435. [Full Text] [PDF]