Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): 935-948 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.935 © 2007 by Project HOPE	New Online   Senate Health Reform Bill   Rewarding Providers   Public Option Policy Brief   Health Reform & Abortion   Delivery System Reform

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Supplemental Exhibits Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lane, C. Articles by Glassman, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lane, C. Articles by Glassman, A. Related Collections International Issues Health Spending

Overview

Bigger And Better? Scaling Up And Innovation In Health Aid

As the volume of health aid to developing countries increases and allocations shift toward specific disease burdens, issues of allocation efficiency become more important to the achievement of better health outcomes. This paper examines (1) whether health aid—traditional and innovative—corresponds to recipients’ needs and priorities and (2) how the terms of aid affect its efficiency. We find that there is considerable scope for improvement through consolidation, improvement of terms, and increased attention to the efficient allocation of the marginal dollar of aid.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lowry and U. Schuklenk Two Models in Global Health Ethics Public Health Ethics, October 29, 2009; (2009) php032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]