Health Affairs, 26, no. 5 (2007): 1231-1234 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1231 © 2007 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vladeck, B. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vladeck, B. C. Related Collections Access To Care Maternal And Child Health Minority Health Public Health Consumer Issues Demography Determinants Of Health

Perspectives

PERSPECTIVE

How Useful Is ‘Vulnerable’ As A Concept?

The relationship between socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and chronic illness, on the one hand, and health status, access to health services, and quality of health care received, on the other, is a central and critical axis of health services research and health policy. However, it is not clear that the use of the term "vulnerable" to apply to individuals, groups, or populations helps very much from either an analytic or a policy perspective. This brief essay explores two instances of "vulnerability" far outside the prevailing paradigm, and it further identifies problems with the term.

                      What's this?