QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 5 (2007): 1399-1406
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1399
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gold, M. R.
* Articles by Siegelberg, T.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Gold, M. R.
* Articles by Siegelberg, T.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Ethical Issues
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Public Opinion
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Medicare And Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Time To Ask The Taxpayers

Marthe R. Gold, Shoshanna Sofaer and Taryn Siegelberg

Maintaining Medicare’s affordability for taxpayers and beneficiaries is becoming harder. Although cost containment strategies have been proposed, using cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to prioritize coverage decisions has not been among them. There is a widespread but largely untested perception that Americans are unwilling to accept limits in health care. We review existing evidence about the public’s willingness to accept constraints and set health care priorities. We suggest that given the opportunity to weigh in on ethical and normative issues that surround CEA, members of the public are appropriate parties to engage in shaping Medicare’s broadest resource allocation questions.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Helfand and G. D. Sanders
Policy Rounds: A New Series and a Call for Papers
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 169 - 171.
[PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies