Health Affairs, 26, no. 6 (2007): 1564-1574
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1564
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Wennberg, J. E.
* Articles by Weinstein, J. N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Wennberg, J. E.
* Articles by Weinstein, J. N.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Medicare
* Quality Of Care
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Evidence-Based Medicine
*Related Article

Extending P4P

Extending The P4P Agenda, Part 1: How Medicare Can Improve Patient Decision Making And Reduce Unnecessary Care

John E. Wennberg, Annette M. O’Connor, E. Dale Collins and James N. Weinstein

The decision to undergo many discretionary medical treatments should be based on informed patient choice. Shared decision making is an effective strategy for achieving this goal. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should extend its pay-for-performance (P4P) agenda to assure that all Americans have access to a certified shared decision-making process. This paper outlines a strategy to achieve informed patient choice as the standard of practice for preference-sensitive care.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

  • John E. Wennberg, Elliott S. Fisher, Jonathan S. Skinner, and Kristen K. Bronner
    Extending The P4P Agenda, Part 2: How Medicare Can Reduce Waste And Improve The Care Of The Chronically Ill
    Health Affairs, November/December 2007; 26(6): 1575-1585.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
S. J. Swensen, J. A. Dilling, D. S. Milliner, R. S. Zimmerman, W. J. Maples, M. E. Lindsay, and G. B. Bartley
Quality: The Mayo Clinic Approach
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2009; 24(5): 428 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. E. Drake, S. M. Wilkniss, R. L. Frounfelker, R. Whitley, A. M. Zipple, G. J. McHugo, and G. R. Bond
Public-Academic Partnerships: The Thresholds-Dartmouth Partnership and Research on Shared Decision Making
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2009; 60(2): 142 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. G. Larriviere and J. L. Bernat
Invited Article: Threats to physician autonomy in a performance-based reimbursement system
Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24): 2338 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. E. Wennberg, E. S. Fisher, J. S. Skinner, and K. K. Bronner
Extending The P4P Agenda, Part 2: How Medicare Can Reduce Waste And Improve The Care Of The Chronically Ill
Health Aff., November 1, 2007; 26(6): 1575 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Concerns Regarding the Extension of the P4P Agenda
Bradley K. Weiner
Health Affairs, 28 Jan 2008 [Full text]