QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 6 (2007): 1612-1621
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1612
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Glied, S. A.
* Articles by Giorgi, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Glied, S. A.
* Articles by Giorgi, G.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Business Of Health
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market
* Related Blog Posts

Health Insurance

Consider It Done? The Likely Efficacy Of Mandates For Health Insurance

Sherry A. Glied, Jacob Hartz and Genessa Giorgi

Several health insurance reform plans, including the recently enacted Massachusetts plan, envision the use of individual or employer mandates to increase coverage rates. In this paper we summarize and analyze existing evidence on the effectiveness of mandates, drawing on evidence both from health insurance and from other arenas where mandates are often used. We find that mandates can, but do not always, increase participation in programs. The effectiveness of a mandate depends critically on the cost of compliance, the penalties for noncompliance, and the timely enforcement of compliance.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


Related Blog Posts:

MUSINGS ON MANDATES: The Rhetoric And The Reality

This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
K. M. Emmons, R. Lobb, E. Puleo, G. Bennett, E. Stoffel, and S. Syngal
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence Among Low-Income Groups With Health Insurance
Health Aff., January 1, 2009; 28(1): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
K. G. H. Okma
Learning and Mislearning across Borders: What Can We (Not) Learn from the 2006 Health Care Reform in the Netherlands? Commentary on Rosenau and Lako
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 1057 - 1071.
[PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. Antos, G. Wilensky, and H. Kuttner
The Obama Plan: More Regulation, Unsustainable Spending
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): w462 - w471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. Furman
Health Reform Through Tax Reform: A Primer
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 622 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
W. P.M.M. van de Ven and F. T. Schut
Universal Mandatory Health Insurance In The Netherlands: A Model For The United States?
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 771 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. A. Glied
Universal Coverage One Head at a Time -- The Risks and Benefits of Individual Health Insurance Mandates
N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 2008; 358(15): 1540 - 1542.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies