Health Affairs, 26, no. 6 (2007): w706-w716 (Published online 23 October 2007) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.w706 © 2007 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Technical Appendix Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barry, C. L. Articles by Sindelar, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barry, C. L. Articles by Sindelar, J. L. Related Collections Health Reform Insurance Coverage Managed Care - Mental Health Mental Health/Substance Abuse Health Spending Consumer Issues Insurance Market

Web Exclusives

Equity In Private Insurance Coverage For Substance Abuse: A Perspective On Parity

Congress is considering enactment of comprehensive parity legislation. The intent of parity is to equalize private coverage of behavioral and general medical care, thereby improving efficiency and fairness in insurance markets. One issue is whether to extend parity to substance abuse (SA) benefits. In the past, inclusion of substance abuse has been a hurdle to passage of parity. We examine the politics of SA parity, compare coverage trends for substance abuse and mental health, and assess the rationale for equalizing benefits. We conclude that the justification for SA parity is as compelling as it is for mental health parity.

                      What's this?