Health Affairs, 27, no. 3 (2008): 633-644 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.633 © 2008 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Figures Only Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steuerle, C. E. Articles by Bovbjerg, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steuerle, C. E. Articles by Bovbjerg, R. R. Related Collections Health Reform Health Spending Politics Related Blog Posts Related Article

Taxes & Budgets

Health And Budget Reform As Handmaidens

Meeting almost any new major federal budget priority—for children, the elderly, energy independence, budget balance, or even the uninsured—soon will be nearly impossible if health costs grow as projected. Budget-driven reforms in health policy, therefore, are almost inevitable for any president seeking to set new national priorities. Those health reforms must confront the fundamental budgetary flaw of health policy: creation of decision-making structures and incentives that look mainly to benefits while shifting costs freely to others. All players need more reliable mechanisms for making choices reasonably, albeit no longer for open-ended consumption of care or payment to providers.

                      What's this?

Related Article

• 
  Financial Basics: Taxes And Budgets
  Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 621
  [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
   
  

Related Blog Posts: