| |
MARKETWATCH
Discretionary Decision Making By Primary Care Physicians And The Cost Of U.S. Health Care
Brenda Sirovich,
Patricia M. Gallagher,
David E. Wennberg and
Elliott S. Fisher
Efforts to improve the quality and costs of U.S. health care have focused largely on fostering physician adherence to evidence-based guidelines, ignoring the role of clinical judgment in more discretionary settings. We surveyed primary care physicians to assess variability in discretionary decision making and evaluate its relationship to the cost of health care. Physicians in high-spending regions see patients back more frequently and are more likely to recommend screening tests of unproven benefit and discretionary interventions compared with physicians in low-spending regions; however, both appear equally likely to recommend guideline-supported interventions. Greater attention should be paid to the local factors that influence physicians clinical judgment in discretionary settings.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Fisher, J. P. Bynum, and J. S. Skinner
Slowing the Growth of Health Care Costs -- Lessons from Regional Variation
N. Engl. J. Med.,
February 26, 2009;
360(9):
849 - 852.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Cooper
States With More Health Care Spending Have Better-Quality Health Care: Lessons About Medicare
Health Aff.,
January 1, 2009;
28(1):
w103 - w115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Skinner, A. Chandra, D. Goodman, and E. S. Fisher
The Elusive Connection Between Health Care Spending And Quality
Health Aff.,
January 1, 2009;
28(1):
w119 - w123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|