| |
The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001–2003
Steven D. Pearson,
Eric C. Schneider,
Ken P. Kleinman,
Kathryn L. Coltin and
Janice A. Singer
Pay-for-performance (P4P) has become one of the dominant approaches to improving quality of care, yet few studies have evaluated its effectiveness. We evaluated the impact on quality of all P4P programs introduced into physician group contracts during 2001–2003 by the five major commercial health plans operating in Massachusetts. Overall, P4P contracts were not associated with greater improvement in quality compared to a rising secular trend. Future research is required to determine whether changes to the magnitude, structure, or alignment of P4P incentives can lead to improved quality.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Damberg, K. Raube, S. S. Teleki, and E. dela Cruz
Taking Stock Of Pay-For-Performance: A Candid Assessment From The Front Lines
Health Aff.,
March 1, 2009;
28(2):
517 - 525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Tompkins, A. R. Higgins, and G. A. Ritter
Measuring Outcomes And Efficiency In Medicare Value-Based Purchasing
Health Aff.,
March 1, 2009;
28(2):
w251 - w261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Goroll
Reforming Physician Payment
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 13, 2008;
359(20):
2087 - 2090.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Comments:
Read all Comments
- P4P: Time To Get Real
- Francois S. de Brantes
- Health Affairs, 14 Aug 2008
[Full text]
|