|
Health Affairs, 27, no. 5 (2008):
w360-w370
(Published online 5 August 2008)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.w360
© 2008 by Project HOPE
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Use Of Larger Versus Smaller Drug-Safety Databases Before Regulatory Approval: The Trade-Offs
Shelby D. Reed,
Kevin J. Anstrom,
Damon M. Seils,
Robert M. Califf and
Kevin A. Schulman
Although efforts to revamp the drug-safety system have been directed at strengthening postmarketing surveillance, strategies for the preapproval stage may be useful. One strategy would be to require larger sample sizes in preapproval safety databases. To evaluate the potential benefits and costs of this approach, we developed a hypothetical model to estimate the expected incremental number of adverse drug events that could be avoided in a postapproval population. We found that the potential to limit adverse events can be an important consideration in sample-size determinations for preapproval trials. Requiring larger preapproval databases could be a cost-effective means of reducing adverse events in postapproval populations.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Allen, A. F. Hernandez, C. M. O'Connor, and G. M. Felker
End points for clinical trials in acute heart failure syndromes.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 16, 2009;
53(24):
2248 - 2258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Garber
Is Having More Preapproval Data The Best Way To Assure Drug Safety?
Health Aff.,
September 1, 2008;
27(5):
w371 - w373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Comments:
Read all Comments
- Hidden Costs To Increased Sample Size
- Stephen A. Williams
- Health Affairs, 19 Aug 2008
[Full text]
|