Health Affairs, 27, no. 6 (2008): 1620-1631 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1620 © 2008 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Figures Only Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Neumann, P. J. Articles by Palmer, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Neumann, P. J. Articles by Palmer, J. A. Related Collections Medicare Research And Technology Health Spending

New Technology

Medicare’s National Coverage Decisions For Technologies, 1999–2007

An analysis of Medicare national coverage decisions (NCDs) from 1999 through 2007 reveals that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considers the available evidence as no better than fair for most of the technologies considered. Still, the CMS issues favorable decisions in 60 percent of the cases it takes on, although almost always with conditions placed on coverage. Since enactment of the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act, which legislated maximum review times for NCDs, the CMS has eliminated "long duration" decisions (more than one year) and has issued several "coverage with evidence development" decisions, which promise flexibility but also carry implementation challenges.

                      What's this?