| |
PERSPECTIVE
Preventing Chronic Disease: An Important Investment, But Dont Count On Cost Savings
Louise B. Russell
Over the four decades since cost-effectiveness analysis was first applied to health and medicine, hundreds of studies have shown that prevention usually adds to medical costs instead of reducing them. Medications for hypertension and elevated cholesterol, diet and exercise to prevent diabetes, and screening and early treatment for cancer all add more to medical costs than they save. Careful choices about frequency, groups to target, and component costs can increase the likelihood that interventions will be highly cost-effective or even cost-saving.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kahn and J. E. Anderson
Improving Diabetes Care: The Model for Health Care Reform
Diabetes Care,
June 1, 2009;
32(6):
1115 - 1118.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Marmor, J. Oberlander, and J. White
The Obama Administration's Options for Health Care Cost Control: Hope Versus Reality
Ann Intern Med,
April 7, 2009;
150(7):
485 - 489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. R. Fuchs
Reforming US Health Care: Key Considerations for the New Administration
JAMA,
March 4, 2009;
301(9):
963 - 964.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Woolf
A Closer Look at the Economic Argument for Disease Prevention
JAMA,
February 4, 2009;
301(5):
536 - 538.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Brink
The Diabetes Prevention Program: How The Participants Did It
Health Aff.,
January 1, 2009;
28(1):
57 - 62.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|