| |
Health Affairs, 28, no. 1 (2009):
w116-w118
(Published online 4 December 2008)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.w116
© 2009 by Project HOPE
|
|
 |
|
|
|
PERSPECTIVE
Coopers Analysis Is Incorrect
Katherine Baicker and
Amitabh Chandra
In his papers, Richard Cooper finds positive associations between health care quality and both specialist and generalist physicians, but he misinterprets his results. Instead of undermining the findings of our study, which found higher quality in areas with more generalists relative to specialists, his results bolster ours: they suggest that the effect of generalists on quality is ten times larger than that of specialists. Furthermore, his rejection of multiple regression in favor of exclusive reliance on isolated correlations precludes him from gauging the relative contributions of specialists, generalists, and other factors. Unfortunately, these deficiencies mean that we can learn little from Coopers analyses.

What's this?
Related Articles
- Richard A. Cooper
States With More Health Care Spending Have Better-Quality Health Care: Lessons About Medicare
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w103-w115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[Figures Only]
[PDF]
- Jonathan Skinner, Amitabh Chandra, David Goodman, and Elliott S. Fisher
The Elusive Connection Between Health Care Spending And Quality
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w119-w123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
- Richard A. Cooper
More Is More And Less Is Less: The Case Of Mississippi
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w124
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
- Susan Dentzer
From The Editor
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w87-w88.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
[Table Of Contents]
- Philip Musgrove
Doctors, Dollars & Quality
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w89-w90.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
- Richard A. Cooper
States With More Physicians Have Better-Quality Health Care
Health Affairs,
January/February
2009; 28(1):
w91-w102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[Figures Only]
[PDF]
|