|
Health Affairs, 28, no. 2 (2009):
w317-w325
(Published online 3 February 2009)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w317
© 2009 by Project HOPE
|
|
 |
|
|
|
TRENDS
The Effects Of The Coverage Gap On Drug Spending: A Closer Look At Medicare Part D
Yuting Zhang,
Julie Marie Donohue,
Joseph P. Newhouse and
Judith R. Lave
We calculated prescription drug usage in two groups of Medicare beneficiaries: employer group with no coverage gap, and individual Part D group with no coverage or some generic drug coverage in the coverage gap. Among those with employer coverage, 40 percent reached the doughnut hole, compared with 25 percent of those without such coverage. Overall, 5 percent went through the doughnut hole to reach the catastrophic coverage level. Those lacking coverage in the doughnut hole reduced their drug use by 14 percent; those with generic coverage reduced their use by 3 percent. Coverage of generic drugs with a $0–$10 copayment in the doughnut hole could be financed by, at most, a six-to-nine-percentage-point increase in initial coinsurance.

What's this?
Related Article
- Sebastian Schneeweiss, Amanda R. Patrick, Alex Pedan, Laleh Varasteh, Raisa Levin, Nan Liu, and William H. Shrank
The Effect Of Medicare Part D Coverage On Drug Use And Cost Sharing Among Seniors Without Prior Drug Benefits
Health Affairs,
March/April
2009; 28(2):
w305-w316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[Figures Only]
[PDF]
[Schematic]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, J. R. Lave, J. P. Newhouse, and J. M. Donohue
How the Medicare Part D Drug Benefit Changed the Distribution of Out-of-Pocket Pharmacy Spending Among Older Beneficiaries
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci,
December 14, 2009;
(2009)
gbp111v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Neuman and J. Cubanski
Medicare Part D Update -- Lessons Learned and Unfinished Business
N. Engl. J. Med.,
July 23, 2009;
361(4):
406 - 414.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|