Health Affairs, 28, no. 2 (2009): w317-w325
(Published online 3 February 2009)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w317
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Reinhardt: Post-Summit
 * Report from the Summit
 * President's Reform Proposal
 * Rising Medicare Costs
 * Spending for Immigrants
 * $2.5 Trillion U.S. Health Tab
 * Child Obesity Briefing
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Zhang, Y.
* Articles by Lave, J. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Zhang, Y.
* Articles by Lave, J. R.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Pharmaceuticals
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Elderly
*Related Article

Web Exclusives

TRENDS

The Effects Of The Coverage Gap On Drug Spending: A Closer Look At Medicare Part D

Yuting Zhang, Julie Marie Donohue, Joseph P. Newhouse and Judith R. Lave

We calculated prescription drug usage in two groups of Medicare beneficiaries: employer group with no coverage gap, and individual Part D group with no coverage or some generic drug coverage in the coverage gap. Among those with employer coverage, 40 percent reached the doughnut hole, compared with 25 percent of those without such coverage. Overall, 5 percent went through the doughnut hole to reach the catastrophic coverage level. Those lacking coverage in the doughnut hole reduced their drug use by 14 percent; those with generic coverage reduced their use by 3 percent. Coverage of generic drugs with a $0–$10 copayment in the doughnut hole could be financed by, at most, a six-to-nine-percentage-point increase in initial coinsurance.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

  • Sebastian Schneeweiss, Amanda R. Patrick, Alex Pedan, Laleh Varasteh, Raisa Levin, Nan Liu, and William H. Shrank
    The Effect Of Medicare Part D Coverage On Drug Use And Cost Sharing Among Seniors Without Prior Drug Benefits
    Health Affairs, March/April 2009; 28(2): w305-w316.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Figures Only] [PDF] [Schematic]
     


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
Y. Zhang, J. R. Lave, J. P. Newhouse, and J. M. Donohue
How the Medicare Part D Drug Benefit Changed the Distribution of Out-of-Pocket Pharmacy Spending Among Older Beneficiaries
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, December 14, 2009; (2009) gbp111v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Neuman and J. Cubanski
Medicare Part D Update -- Lessons Learned and Unfinished Business
N. Engl. J. Med., July 23, 2009; 361(4): 406 - 414.
[Full Text] [PDF]