Health Affairs, 28, no. 3 (2009): w399-w410
(Published online 17 March 2009)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w399
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Oberlander, J. B.
* Articles by Lyons, B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Oberlander, J. B.
* Articles by Lyons, B.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage - Children
* Managed Care - Medicaid
* Maternal And Child Health
* Medicaid
* Politics

Web Exclusives

Beyond Incrementalism? SCHIP And The Politics Of Health Reform

Jonathan B. Oberlander and Barbara Lyons

When Congress enacted the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 1997, it was heralded as a model of bipartisan, incremental health policy. However, despite the program’s achievements in the ensuing decade, SCHIP’s reauthorization triggered political conflict, and efforts to expand the program stalemated in 2007. The 2008 elections broke that stalemate, and in 2009 the new Congress passed, and President Barack Obama signed, legislation reauthorizing SCHIP. Now that attention is turning to comprehensive health reform, what lessons can reformers learn from SCHIP’s political adventures?


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?