Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): 1418-1428
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * New August Issue
 * EHRs & Meaningful Use
 * Who Gains From Reform?
 * Reform & Election Battles
 * Pre-Existing Condition Coverage
 * Policy Brief: ACOs
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Miller, H. D.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Miller, H. D.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Managed Care
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Health Spending

Changing Incentives

From Volume To Value: Better Ways To Pay For Health Care

Harold D. Miller

Payment systems for health care today are based on rewarding volume, not value for the money spent. Two proposed methods of payment, "episode-of-care payment" and "comprehensive care payment" (condition-adjusted capitation), could facilitate higher quality and lower cost by avoiding the problems of both fee-for-service payment and traditional capitation. The most appropriate payment systems for different types of patient conditions and some methods of addressing design and implementation issues are discussed. Although the new payment systems are desirable, many providers are not organized to accept or use them, so transitional approaches such as "virtual bundling," described in this paper, will be needed.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?