Health Affairs

Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): 1438-1447 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1438 © 2009 by Project HOPE	New Online   Getting Health Reform Done   After the State of the Union   Incremental Reform   E-Health in Developing World   Most-Read Articles in 2009

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, J. C. Articles by Yanagihara, D. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, J. C. Articles by Yanagihara, D. Related Collections Health Reform Business Of Health Physicians State/Local Issues Health Spending State/Local Issues - California

Changing Incentives

Measurement Of And Reward For Efficiency In California’s Pay-For-Performance Program

James C. Robinson, Thomas Williams and Dolores Yanagihara

Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are expanding their purview from quality to include efficiency, and many consider the episode of care as the appropriate unit of measurement. Two years’ experience by the California P4P program, however, reveals that the requisite claims data often are incomplete or poorly coded and that even large physician groups have too few patients experiencing most types of episodes to permit statistically valid measurement for public reporting and incentive payment. The California P4P program is shifting its efficiency focus to metrics not reliant on episode measurement while shifting episode measurement to supporting bundled payment for acute surgical and medical interventions.

                      What's this?