Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): 1475-1484
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1475
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Appendices
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Google Scholar
* Articles by Jha, A. K.
* Articles by Bates, D. W.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Jha, A. K.
* Articles by Bates, D. W.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Hospitals
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Quality Of Care
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Improving Safety And Eliminating Redundant Tests: Cutting Costs In U.S. Hospitals

Ashish K. Jha, David C. Chan, Abigail B. Ridgway, Calvin Franz and David W. Bates

High costs and unsafe care are major challenges for U.S. hospitals. Two sources of raised costs and unsafe care are adverse events in hospitals and tests ordered by several different physicians. After reviewing rates of these two occurrences in U.S. hospitals and simulating their costs, we estimated that in 2004 alone, eliminating readily preventable adverse events would have resulted in direct savings of more than $16.6 billion (5.5 percent of total inpatient costs). Eliminating redundant tests would have saved an additional $8 billion (2.7 percent). Addressing these situations could generate major savings to the system while improving patient care.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?