Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): w937-w947 (Published online 20 August 2009) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w937 © 2009 by Project HOPE	New Online   Senate Health Reform Bill   Rewarding Providers   Public Option Policy Brief   Health Reform & Abortion   Delivery System Reform

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Additional Sources Submit a response to this article Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Berenson, R. A. Articles by November, E. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berenson, R. A. Articles by November, E. A. Related Collections Access To Care Hospitals Business Of Health Research And Technology Consumer Issues

Web Exclusives

Does Telemonitoring Of Patients—The eICU—Improve Intensive Care?

Intensive care units are an essential and costly component in most U.S. hospitals. However, little is actually known about what staffing and work-process interventions produce the best balance of quality and costs. We explore the reasons hospitals chose to either adopt or reject an innovative telemedicine approach to supporting delivery of intensive care. Hospital clinical leaders hold strong views but have little objective information on which to judge the worthiness of this innovation. We argue that comparative effectiveness initiatives should emphasize delivery-system and work-process innovations, which are relatively understudied compared to specific drugs, devices, and services.

                      What's this?

Comments: