|
How Nonprofits Matter In American Medicine, And What To Do About It
Mark Schlesinger and
Bradford H. Gray
Skeptics question nonprofit health care on the grounds that nonprofits fail to distinguish themselves from their for-profit counterparts and do not reliably provide community benefits commensurate with their tax subsidies. Drawing on the most recent and comprehensive evidence, we assess these charges, judging them to be either wrong or incomplete. Although conventional critiques are therefore unconvincing, there are nonetheless important challenges facing the nonprofit sector in American medicine. To address these, we propose reformulating ownership-related policies to define both the appropriate forms of community benefit and the appropriate mix of ownership in terms of local markets and communities.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Bloche
Tax Preferences For Nonprofits: From Per Se Exemption To Pay-For-Performance
Health Aff.,
July 1, 2006;
25(4):
W304 - W307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Hyman and W. M. Sage
Subsidizing Health Care Providers Through The Tax Code: Status Or Conduct?
Health Aff.,
July 1, 2006;
25(4):
W312 - W315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Comments:
Read all Comments
- If Not-For-Profits Are Indeed Better, Why Is That The Case?
- Stephen Miller
- Health Affairs, 23 Jun 2006
[Full text]
- Another Perspective on Nonprofit Health Care
- Howard Berman
- Health Affairs, 27 Jun 2006
[Full text]
- Study Lacks Original Research, Fresh Focus
- Charles N. Kahn III
- Health Affairs, 6 Sep 2006
[Full text]
- Problems with Some Studies on the Benefits of Nonprofit Hospitals
- William G. Kelly Jr.
- Health Affairs, 13 Feb 2008
[Full text]
|