Health Affairs, 25, no. 2 (2006): w48-w50 (Published online 7 February 2006) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w48 © 2006 by Project HOPE	New Online   Senate Health Reform Bill   Rewarding Providers   Public Option Policy Brief   Health Reform & Abortion   Delivery System Reform

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cutler, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cutler, D. M.

Web Exclusives

PERSPECTIVE

Making Sense Of Medical Technology

In seeking to explain contradictory reports that increased medical spending is both valuable and wasteful, Jonathan Skinner and colleagues rightly emphasize differences in regional practice patterns in response to constraints. However, it is more accurate to view the situation not as a choice between valuable but inexpensive care and more costly care with worse outcomes—as Skinner and colleagues theorize—but as a choice between responses to regional inefficiencies. Given that we do not know what will best improve the efficiency of medical care in a given area, experiments with financial incentives to both providers and individual patients should receive high priority.

                      What's this?