Health Affairs, 25, no. 6 (2006): w586-w588 (Published online 7 November 2006) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w586 © 2006 by Project HOPE	New Online   How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?   Debating Cost Of Uninsured   Try Medicare-For-All   HA Blog Top 10

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buto, K. Articles by Juhn, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buto, K. Articles by Juhn, P. Related Collections Business Of Health Evidence-Based Medicine Insurance Coverage Medicare Quality Of Care Research And Technology Health Spending Politics

Web Exclusives

PERSPECTIVE

Can A Center For Comparative Effectiveness Information Succeed? Perspectives From A Health Care Company

Comparative information about different approaches to treating a disease or condition plays a critical role in the success of any competitive, market-based health care system in achieving quality and value. To ensure that effectiveness studies will be used to stimulate development of important advances in care and not lead to limits in coverage and treatment options, a comparative effectiveness center needs to demonstrate independence from payers; operate with transparent processes; and coordinate, not duplicate, the requirements of the relevant federal agencies. A fully independent, quasi-governmental center is most likely to produce credible, broadly acceptable findings.

                      What's this?