Health Affairs, 25, no. 6 (2006): w593-w595 (Published online 7 November 2006) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w593 © 2006 by Project HOPE	New Online   How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?   Debating Cost Of Uninsured   Try Medicare-For-All   HA Blog Top 10

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, J. W. Articles by McGinnis, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rowe, J. W. Articles by McGinnis, J. M. Related Collections Business Of Health Evidence-Based Medicine Insurance Coverage Medicare Quality Of Care Research And Technology Health Spending Politics

Web Exclusives

PERSPECTIVE

The Emerging Context For Advances In Comparative Effectiveness Assessment

The call for an entity for independent assessment and guidance on alternative medical interventions is timely. The emergence of four developments underscores the importance and sets the stage for progress: an improving evidence base; growing recognition of the importance of variation in the effectiveness of treatments across patients; recent emphasis on transparency; and growing adoption of pay-for-performance initiatives. To advance progress on these issues, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has convened a Roundtable on Evidence-based Medicine. The roundtable is exploring ways to improve the development of evidence, the thoroughness with which it is applied, and the mechanisms for increasing national capacity for the work.

                      What's this?