QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): w483-w487
(Published online 7 June 2007)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w483
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Appendix Table
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Buchmueller, T. C.
* Articles by Zuvekas, S. H.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Buchmueller, T. C.
* Articles by Zuvekas, S. H.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Insurance - Employer-Based System
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Managed Care - Mental Health
* Business Of Health
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues

Web Exclusives

TRENDS

Parity For Whom? Exemptions And The Extent Of State Mental Health Parity Legislation

Thomas C. Buchmueller, Philip F. Cooper, Mireille Jacobson and Samuel H. Zuvekas

Between 1997 and 2003, the share of workers subject to mental health parity laws greatly increased. But because of exemptions for self-insured firms and small firms, coverage is much lower than a simple tally of state mandates would suggest. Limits on the types of conditions covered further weaken these laws. This paper summarizes the extent and scope of state parity legislation in terms of the number of insured private-sector employees covered. It explicitly accounts for the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption for self-insured plans, exemptions for small employers, and the range of conditions covered by the law.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. H. Zuvekas and C. D. Meyerhoefer
State Variations In The Out-Of-Pocket Spending Burden For Outpatient Mental Health Treatment
Health Aff., May 1, 2009; 28(3): 713 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. N. Trivedi, S. Swaminathan, and V. Mor
Insurance Parity and the Use of Outpatient Mental Health Care Following a Psychiatric Hospitalization
JAMA, December 24, 2008; 300(24): 2879 - 2885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
C. J. Robbins, T. Rudsenske, and J. S. Vaughan
Private Equity Investment In Health Care Services
Health Aff., September 1, 2008; 27(5): 1389 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
D. A. Regier, L. F. Bufka, T. Whitaker, F. F. Duffy, W. E. Narrow, D. S. Rae, G. M. Reed, O. F. Rehman, M. Rubio-Stipec, T. Weismiller, et al.
Parity And The Use Of Out-Of-Network Mental Health Benefits In The FEHB Program
Health Aff., January 1, 2008; 27(1): w70 - w83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies