QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): w500-w515
(Published online 19 June 2007)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w500
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * House Health Reform Bill
 * Paying for Reform
 * Vetting AHIP's Report
 * HIV/AIDS Costs
 * Brief: Insurance Reform
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Tunis, S. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Tunis, S. R.
Related Collections
* Insurance Coverage
* Medicare
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Evidence-Based Medicine

Web Exclusives

INTERVIEW

Reflections On Science, Judgment, And Value In Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Conversation With David Eddy

Sean R. Tunis

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has increasingly influenced decision making in health policy and patient care. Appropriate use of EBM in decision making requires a clear understanding of the distinct "anatomical" components of all decisions: (1) scientific evidence and (2) judgments applied to that evidence by individuals or organizations. In this interview, Sean Tunis discusses these principles with David Eddy. Tunis has provided leadership at the national level in applying EBM principles to health policy decision making at the Office of Technology Assessment, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and now the Center for Medical Technology Policy. Eddy is cofounder and medical director of Archimedes; he is widely recognized as a seminal contributor to evidence-based medicine, helping shape the initial ideas and applying them to guidelines, coverage policies, and performance measures.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FocusHome page
F. F. Duffy, T. Craig, E. K. Moscicki, J. C. West, and L. J. Fochtmann
Performance in Practice: Clinical Tools to Improve the Care of Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Focus, April 1, 2009; 7(2): 186 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. Tricoci, J. M. Allen, J. M. Kramer, R. M. Califf, and S. C. Smith Jr
Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines
JAMA, February 25, 2009; 301(8): 831 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
K. Chalkidou, J. Lord, A. Fischer, and P. Littlejohns
Evidence-Based Decision Making: When Should We Wait For More Information?
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1642 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
P. S. Douglas, M. Budoff, S. Tunis, P. K. Woodard, R. A. Justman, and R. Honigberg
A New Era for Cardiovascular Imaging? Implications of the Revoked National Coverage Decision for CT Angiography on Future Imaging Reimbursement.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 398 - 403.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
Medicare's Coverage With Evidence Development: A Policy-Making Tool in Evolution
J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2007; 3(6): 296 - 301.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Revisiting Anatomy of Decisions in Context of EBM Judgments
Richard E Ward
Health Affairs, 29 Jun 2007 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies