|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Parity And The Use Of Out-Of-Network Mental Health Benefits In The FEHB Program
1 Darrell Regier is executive director of the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) in Arlington, Virginia.
*Corresponding author.
Two current congressional bills mandate parity for benefits for mental disorders with benefits for medical/surgical conditions in private insurance when mental health benefits are provided; the bills differ in regard to benefit levels and access to out-of-network coverage. This study assessed clinicians' and beneficiaries' participation in managed care networks in the national capital area under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) parity program. Approximately one-third of the clinicians studied participated in FEHB networks, and only 44 percent of FEHB patients received care from network clinicians. Out-of-network mental health benefits are an important policy consideration to ensure access to mental health treatment under parity proposals. [Health Affairs 27, no. 1 (2008): w70-w83 (published online 18 December 2007; 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w70)] Key Words: Access To Care, Business Of Health, Consumer Issues, Health Reform, Insurance Coverage, Mental Health/Substance Abuse, Health Spending, Politics
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||