QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 27, no. 6 (2008): w566-w575
(Published online 28 October 2008)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.w566
© 2008 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gabel, J. R.
* Articles by Bassett, V.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Gabel, J. R.
* Articles by Bassett, V.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Business Of Health
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Politics
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market

Web Exclusives

TRENDS

After The Mandates: Massachusetts Employers Continue To Support Health Reform As More Firms Offer Coverage

Jon R. Gabel, Heidi Whitmore, Jeremy Pickreign, Will Sellheim, ShovaKC and Valerie Bassett

Based on a spring 2008 survey of 1,003 randomly selected Massachusetts firms, this paper examines views and responses of employers to health care reform after employer and individual mandates went into effect. A majority of firms view reform as "good for Massachusetts." The percentage of firms with three or more workers offering coverage increased from 73 percent to 79 percent. Massachusetts employers are less likely than employers nationally to indicate plans to terminate coverage or restrict eligibility for health benefits, which suggests that crowd-out is not occurring.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. S. Weissman and J. Bigby
Massachusetts Health Care Reform -- Near-Universal Coverage at What Cost?
N. Engl. J. Med., November 19, 2009; 361(21): 2012 - 2015.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. A. Brennan and M. M. Mello
Incremental Health Care Reform
JAMA, May 6, 2009; 301(17): 1814 - 1816.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. Curtis and E. Neuschler
Affording Shared Responsibility For Universal Coverage: Insights From California
Health Aff., May 1, 2009; 28(3): w417 - w430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. K. Long and P. B. Masi
How Have Employers Responded To Health Reform In Massachusetts? Employees' Views At The End Of One Year
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): w576 - w583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Response to Gabel et al.
Steffie Woolhandler, et al.
Health Affairs, 12 Nov 2008 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2008 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies