Health Affairs, 28, no. 4 (2009): w688-w696 (Published online 18 June 2009) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w688 © 2009 by Project HOPE	New Online   Senate Health Reform Bill   Rewarding Providers   Public Option Policy Brief   Health Reform & Abortion   Delivery System Reform

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Iglehart, J. K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iglehart, J. K. Related Collections Health Reform Legal/Regulatory Issues Managed Care - Medicaid Managed Care - Medicare Medicaid Medicare Business Of Health Health Spending Consumer Issues

Web Exclusives

INTERVIEW

Doing More With Less: A Conversation With Kerry Weems

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is a resource-starved agency with few friends on Capitol Hill. From the perspective of its last administrator, neither Congress nor the White House, regardless of party, provides CMS with the resources to effectively manage its vast responsibilities—particularly when it comes to fighting fraud, which costs taxpayers billions every year. Although its annual expenditures approach $700 billion, CMS has fewer full-time employees today (about 4,600) than it had a decade ago. With the prospect of health care reform looming, the role that Congress may assign CMS in its weakened state becomes a major policy question.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. K. Iglehart Reform, Regulation, and Research -- An Interview with Gail Wilensky N. Engl. J. Med., September 10, 2009; 361(11): 1038 - 1040. [Full Text] [PDF]