QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: October 7, 2004
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Table of Contents
* HTML Version
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by O’Connor, A. M.
* Articles by Flood, A. B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by O’Connor, A. M.
* Articles by Flood, A. B.
Related Collections
* Chronic Care
* Quality Of Care
* Consumer Issues
* Variations
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63
Copyright © 2004 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

Modifying Unwarranted Variations In Health Care: Shared Decision Making Using Patient Decision Aids

Annette M. O’Connor 1*, Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas 2, Ann Barry Flood 3

1 Annette O’Connor is a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Health Care Consumer Decision Support and a professor at the University of Ottawa (Ontario), and a senior scientist with the Ottawa Health Research Institute.
2 Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas is a professor in the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, and faculty in the Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences at Dartmouth in Hanover, New Hampshire.
3 Ann Barry Flood holds these same appointments at Dartmouth and is a professor in the Department of Sociology, Dartmouth College.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

Shared decision making is the process of interacting with patients in arriving at informed values-based choices when options have features that patients value differently. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are evidence-based tools designed to facilitate that process. Numerous randomized trials indicate that PtDAs improve decision quality and prevent overuse of options that informed patients do not value. Therefore, they have a potential role in reducing unwarranted variations in the use of preference-sensitive health care options. However, barriers to their widespread use need to be addressed with coherent plans for ensuring good standards, improving access to PtDAs, training practitioners, testing practice models, and launching demonstration projects.

Key Words: Chronic Care, Consumer Issues, Quality Of Care, Variations


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. N. Lee and C. Y. Ko
Beyond Outcomes--The Appropriateness of Surgical Care
JAMA, October 14, 2009; 302(14): 1580 - 1581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. M. Kymes
The Role of Preference-Based Measures of Health States: How Can We Use the Vision Preference Value Scale?
Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2008; 126(12): 1765 - 1766.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. H. Woolf, E. C.Y. Chan, R. Harris, S. L. Sheridan, C. H. Braddock III, R. M. Kaplan, A. Krist, A. M. O'Connor, and S. Tunis
Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making
Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 293 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies