Posting date: October 15, 2003
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gillies, R. R.
* Articles by Rundall, T. G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Gillies, R. R.
* Articles by Rundall, T. G.
Related Collections
* Managed Care - Physicians
* Business Of Health
* Physicians
* State/Local Issues
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.492
Copyright © 2003 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

How Different Is California? A Comparison Of U.S. Physician Organizations

Robin R. Gillies 1*, Stephen M. Shortell 2, Lawrence Casalino 3, James C. Robinson 4, Thomas G. Rundall 5

1 Robin Gillies is a project director in the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
2 Steve Shortell is dean of the School of Public Health, and professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
3 Larry Casalino is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago.
4 Jamie Robinson is a professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management, UC Berkeley School of Public Health.
5 Tom Rundall is a professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management, UC Berkeley School of Public Health.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

Data from a national study of medical groups and independent practice associations are used to examine the extent to which California physician organizations are different from physician organizations in the rest of the United States. California physician organizations are different in many ways: most notably, they are more likely to have external incentives to improve quality and more likely to use recommended care management processes for treating patients with chronic illnesses. The implications of these differences for policy and practice are discussed.

Key Words: Physicians, State/Local Issues, Managed Care--Physicians, Business Of Health


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Mehrotra, A. M. Epstein, and M. B. Rosenthal
Do Integrated Medical Groups Provide Higher-Quality Medical Care than Individual Practice Associations?
Ann Intern Med, December 5, 2006; 145(11): 826 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. P. Casalino
Which Type of Medical Group Provides Higher-Quality Care?
Ann Intern Med, December 5, 2006; 145(11): 860 - 861.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. M. Yegian
Coordinated Care In A 'Consumer-Driven' Health System
Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): w531 - w536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]