QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: November 19, 2003
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Submit a response to this article
* View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Dale, S.
* Articles by Carlson, B. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Dale, S.
* Articles by Carlson, B. L.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Chronic Care
* Consumer Issues
* Home Care
* Insurance Coverage
* Medicaid
* Medicare
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.566
Copyright © 2003 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

The Effects Of Cash And Counseling On Personal Care Services And Medicaid Costs In Arkansas

Stacy Dale 1, Randall Brown 2*, Barbara Phillips 3, Jennifer Schore 4, Barbara Lepidus Carlson 5

1 Stacy Dale is a researcher at Mathematica Policy Research in Princeton, New Jersey.
2 Randall Brown, is a senior fellow at Mathematica Policy Research in Princeton, New Jersey and the project's director and co-principal investigator.
3 Barbara Phillips is the study's principal investigator; she is an independent consultant in San Diego, California.
4 Jennifer Schore is a senior researcher and the deputy project director at Mathematica, in Princeton.
5 Barbara Lepidus Carlson is a senior sampling statistician and survey director at Mathematica, in Princeton.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

The Cash and Counseling Demonstration gives Medicaid beneficiaries who are eligible for personal care services a consumer-directed allowance in lieu of traditional agency services. Using survey and Medicaid claims data on 2,008 adult applicants randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, we find the program increased the receipt of paid care but reduced unpaid care. The treatment group had higher Medicaid personal care expenditures than controls did, because many controls received no paid help, and recipients obtained only two-thirds of entitled services. By the second year after enrollment, these higher personal care expenditures were offset by lower spending for nursing homes and other Medicaid services.

Key Words: Access To Care, Chronic Care, Consumer Issues, Home Care, Insurance Coverage, Medicaid, Medicare


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
E. F. Haislmaier and N. Owcharenko
The Massachusetts Approach: A New Way To Restructure State Health Insurance Markets And Public Programs
Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): 1580 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Effects of Cash & Counseling on Personal Care & Medicaid Costs
Patty McDonald
Health Affairs, 21 Nov 2003 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2003 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies