QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: March 31, 2004
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Related Papers
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Aaron, H. J.
* Articles by Butler, S. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Aaron, H. J.
* Articles by Butler, S. M.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Consumer Issues
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Politics
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.168
Copyright © 2004 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

How Federalism Could Spur Bipartisan Action On The Uninsured

Henry J. Aaron 1* Stuart M. Butler 2

1 Henry Aaron is a senior fellow in health economics at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
2 Stuart Butler is vice president for domestic and economic policy studies at the Heritage Foundation, also in Washington.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

National efforts to greatly reduce the number of uninsured Americans have made little progress for decades because achieving majority support for any one approach has proved to be impossible. While as authors we remain unreconciled on the best solutions, we share the belief that federally supported state experimentation is a promising way to make progress. States should be allowed to try widely differing solutions with federal financial support under legislated guidelines, including specific protections and measurable goals. Congress would enact a "policy toolbox" of federal initiatives that states could include, and funding to states would be linked to success in reaching the goals.

Key Words: Access To Care, Consumer Issues, Health Reform, Health Spending, Insurance Coverage, Politics


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
H. J. Aaron and S. M. Butler
A Federalist Approach To Health Reform: The Worst Way, Except For All The Others
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 725 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
A. Weil
How Far Can States Take Health Reform?
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 736 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Garson Jr and D. Blumenthal
State-Federal Partnerships for Access to Care: An End and a Means
JAMA, March 14, 2007; 297(10): 1112 - 1115.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies