QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: May 3, 2005
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Online Supplement
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Scheffler, R. M.
* Articles by Adams, N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Scheffler, R. M.
* Articles by Adams, N.
Related Collections
* Consumer Issues
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Mental Health/Substance Abuse
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Politics
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.212
Copyright © 2005 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

Millionaires And Mental Health: Proposition 63 In California

Richard M. Scheffler 1* Neal Adams 2

1 Richard Scheffler directs the Nicholas C. Petris Center on Health Care Markets and Consumer Welfare at the University of California, Berkeley, where he is also a distinguished professor of health economics and public policy.
2 Neal Adams is director of special projects at the California Institute of Mental Health in Sacramento.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

In November 2004 California passed Proposition 63, a landmark piece of mental health and fiscal legislation. This initiative places a 1 percent tax on adjusted gross income over $1 million, affecting about 30,000 taxpayers and raising $1.8 billion (a 31 percent increase) in new revenues over the first three years to support county-operated mental health systems. Our analysis suggests that Proposition 63 passed with strong support from Democrats, urban dwellers, and social workers and in counties with high rates of homelessness. Proposition 63 faces challenges in implementation and provides unprecedented opportunities for transformation and change.

Key Words: Consumer Issues, Legal/Regulatory Issues, Mental Health/Substance Abuse, State/Local Issues, Health Spending, Politics


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. Cunningham, K. McKenzie, and E. F. Taylor
The struggle to provide community-based care to low-income people with serious mental illnesses.
Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): 694 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies