QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: August 16, 2005
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Coughlin, T. A.
* Articles by Zuckerman, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Coughlin, T. A.
* Articles by Zuckerman, S.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Medicaid
* Business Of Health
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.385
Copyright © 2005 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

Three Years Of State Fiscal Struggles: How Did Medicaid And SCHIP Fare?

Teresa A. Coughlin 1* Stephen Zuckerman 2

1 Terri Coughlin is a principal research associate in the Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, in Washington, D.C.
2 Steve Zuckerman is also a principal research associate in the Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, in Washington, D.C.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

During 2003-05, states faced some of the largest budget shortfalls since World War II. With a focus on Medicaid and SCHIP, we examine budget decisions in eight states during this period. Increasing Medicaid enrollment because of the economic downturn and rising health care costs compounded state budget shortfalls as state revenues dropped; problems peaked in 2004. States, however, were reluctant to confront their budget deficits as long-term problems and implemented a variety of one-time revenue strategies and spending reductions that push fiscal problems into the future. The arrival of federal fiscal relief in late 2003 helped states avoid deeper cuts but did not eliminate cutbacks.

Key Words: Access To Care, Business Of Health, Consumer Issues, Medicaid, State/Local Issues, Health Spending


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. E. Hurley, L. Felland, A. Gerland, and J. Pickreign
Public Employees' Health Benefits Survive Major Threats, So Far
Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): w195 - w203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies