QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: August 23, 2005
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Supplemental Exhibits
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Pizer, S. D.
* Articles by Frakt, A. B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Pizer, S. D.
* Articles by Frakt, A. B.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Business Of Health
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.399
Copyright © 2005 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

Defective Design: Regional Competition In Medicare

Steven D. Pizer 1*, Roger Feldman 2, Austin B. Frakt 3

1 Steven Pizer is a health economist, Health Care Financing and Economics, at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Health Care System and an assistant professor of health services at the Boston University School of Public Health.
2 Roger Feldman is the Blue Cross Professor of Health Insurance, Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, in Minneapolis.
3 Austin Frakt is a health systems research scientist, Health Care Financing and Economics, at the VA Boston Health Care System.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 creates several new types of private insurance plans in Medicare. The most familiar of these is the preferred provider organization (PPO). Uneven application of regional bidding requirements will place new PPOs at a competitive disadvantage relative to established health maintenance organizations (HMOs). A little-noticed section of the regulations implementing MMA offsets this disadvantage and gives PPOs a strong incentive to bid in some regions, but costs to the taxpayer will be high: up to $60 billion over ten years.

Key Words: Business Of Health, Consumer Issues, Health Reform, Legal/Regulatory Issues, Managed Care - Medicare, Medicare, State/Local Issues, Health Spending, Insurance Market


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. A. Berenson
From Politics To Policy: A New Payment Approach In Medicare Advantage
Health Aff., March 1, 2008; 27(2): w156 - w164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies