QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Posting date: October 11, 2005
This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* HTML Version
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Carlson, R. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Carlson, R. J.
Related Collections
* Ethical Issues
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Minority Health
* Pharmaceuticals
* Consumer Issues
* Demography
*Related Article
Health Affairs, 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.464
Copyright © 2005 by Project HOPE


Web Exclusives

The Case Of BiDil: A Policy Commentary On Race And Genetics

Rick J. Carlson 1*

1 Rick Carlson is a clinical professor; Policy Programs, and a senior adviser in the Resource Center for Health Policy, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, at the University of Washington in Seattle.

*Corresponding author.

  Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of BiDil unleashed a vigorous commentary, mostly critical of the decision. The FDA was soon caught between biologists, who see research and clinical utility in using racial classifications, and social scientists (and many politicians), who fear the adversities of greater discrimination. Analyses rarely addressed the practical factors the FDA had to consider in reaching a decision. Much of the literature simply assigned the question to the domain of racial politics, failing to consider the ethics of professional care, the Hippocratic oath, and the marketplace efficiency in moving drugs quickly to those who might most benefit.

Key Words: Business Of Health, Consumer Issues, Demography, Ethical Issues, Legal/Regulatory Issues, Minority Health, Pharmaceuticals


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

  • Pamela Sankar and Jonathan Kahn
    BiDil: Race Medicine Or Race Marketing?
    Health Affairs Web Exclusive, October 11, 2005
    [Abstract] [PDF] [HTML Version]
     


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Bibbins-Domingo and A. Fernandez
BiDil for Heart Failure in Black Patients: Implications of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval
Ann Intern Med, January 2, 2007; 146(1): 52 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Response to BiDil Commentary
Mirta R. Goldstein, MBA, MSc
Health Affairs, 12 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Correcting Carlson
Pamela Sankar, et al.
Health Affairs, 18 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Re: Correcting Carlson
Rick J. Carlson
Health Affairs, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies