QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation

Mental Health

The Sunset Of Federal Mental Health Parity


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

PROLOGUE: Well shy of an overwhelming political mandate and unsupported by verifiable cost estimates, the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 was a skeletal and partially symbolic victory for its advocates. The direct impact of the law’s minimalist provisions has been so slight that onlookers might be tempted to wonder what all the fuss is about when Congress takes up the question of renewing the parity law before it sunsets this fall. But two essays and a state legislator’s perspective here help to explain that the federal parity law has had a powerful influence on how state mental health policy . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2001 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies