| |
PERSPECTIVE
Some Thoughts On The White-Follows-Green Law
Fitzhugh Mullan
| The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
During my residency years there was a sardonic comment often applied to colleagues departing for lucrative practices. "White follows green," the adage went, meaning that doctors went where the money was. The provocative thesis of Richard Cooper and his colleagues has raised this flippancy to the level of an economic principle, suggesting an inevitability to the growth in the physician supply and the associated costs of an ever enlarging complement of medical practitioners.
The problem with Cooper and colleagues thesis that physician supply consistently correlates with GDP (gross domestic product) or personal income is that it suggests a wealth-driven inexorability . . . [Full Text of this Article]

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hagopian
Recruiting Primary Care Physicians From Abroad: Is Poaching From Low-Income Countries Morally Defensible?
Ann. Fam. Med,
November 1, 2007;
5(6):
483 - 485.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Goodman and the Committee on Pediatric Workforce
The Pediatrician Workforce: Current Status and Future Prospects
Pediatrics,
July 1, 2005;
116(1):
e156 - e173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Cooper
Weighing the Evidence for Expanding Physician Supply
Ann Intern Med,
November 2, 2004;
141(9):
705 - 714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Mick
The Physician "Surplus" and the Decline of Professional Dominance
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law,
August 1, 2004;
29(4-5):
907 - 924.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|