Health Affairs, 24, no. 3 (2005): 885-886
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.885-a
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Reinhardt: Post-Summit
 * Report from the Summit
 * President's Reform Proposal
 * Rising Medicare Costs
 * Spending for Immigrants
 * $2.5 Trillion U.S. Health Tab
 * Child Obesity Briefing
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gosfield, A. G.
* Articles by Reinertsen, J. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Gosfield, A. G.
* Articles by Reinertsen, J. L.

Letters

CPGs: Think Core Concept


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In their paper on the promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine (Jan/Feb 05), Stefan Timmermans and Aaron Mauck cite a number of barriers that hinder physicians from adhering to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We offer one more: There is little understanding of how CPGs can help physicians in their daily work. In a practice environment where the payment systems bear no relationship to science or quality, day-to-day work is complicated by potential auditor requirements to document patient care, receive prior authorization of services by health plans, and manage prescription needs to plan-specific formularies. Physicians often see CPGs as simply adding . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alice G. Gosfield and James L. Reinertsen


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?