QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 4 (2005): 927
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.927
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Debating Cost Of Uninsured
 * Try Medicare-For-All
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content

FDA Under Scrutiny

PROLOGUE

How To Get The Data? Scrutiny Of Postmarketing Surveillance At The FDA


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

How do we prove that our drugs and therapeutic devices are safe? This has been the core mission of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since its founding in the first decade of the twentieth century. Recent events in the wake of Merck’s withdrawal of Vioxx and the return of silicone breast implants have subjected the FDA’s approval procedures and postmarketing surveillance to intense scrutiny. Congress, newspaper and journal articles, bloggers, and even stockholders have questioned whether the FDA is capable of upholding its mission. Do we need to strengthen the postmarketing surveillance group within the FDA? Do we . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies