QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 5 (2005): 1102
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1102
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content

Economics Of Health Information Technology

PROLOGUE

The Economics Of Health Information Technology


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Just about everybody’s basic theory about financing health information technology (HIT) is that sooner or later it pays for itself, perhaps many times over. Halting progress toward HIT adoption is explained by the corollary proposition that this rich payoff accrues to a different group of stakeholders—payers and patients—and not the providers who must make the up-front investment. The great divide in HIT policy is related to this incentive gap and how to bridge it.

The first group of papers in this special issue of Health Affairs explore the economic interactions that ultimately connect the parties in this wilderness. While visions . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies