QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 2 (2006): 566-567
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.566-b
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Enthoven, A. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Enthoven, A. C.

Letters

Choice In Health Care


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In reading their paper on creating a better health care system (Nov/Dec 05), I was disappointed that my Stanford University friends and colleagues, John Cogan and Daniel Kessler, did not include the principle that all consumers should have a financially responsible choice among alternative health care financing and delivery plans—as we have here at Stanford. Perhaps they took it for granted that most people have this kind of choice, although, in fact, barely 10 percent of the employed insured do.

It is important for people to have such a choice because premium differences (risk-adjusted) reflect the total annual per capita . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alain C. Enthoven


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies